The Mind Collection Newsletter

Share this post
3 Ideas in 2 Minutes on Putting Things in Perspective
chrismeyer.substack.com

3 Ideas in 2 Minutes on Putting Things in Perspective

Fallhöhe, Scope Neglect & Heuristic Questions

Chris Meyer
Jun 8
Share this post
3 Ideas in 2 Minutes on Putting Things in Perspective
chrismeyer.substack.com
Putting Things in Perspective
Church of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

I. Fallhöhe

In literature, the German loanword Fallhöhe (height of fall) is the extent of a dramatic hero's fall. Imagine a well-respected and morally steadfast queen being slowly corrupted until she’s lost everything. Compare that to the fall of a hapless poor nobody with nothing left to lose.

The higher the status of a character, the more empathy an audience will feel for his or her downfall. The term was coined by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer. He noted that people with low social standing can always be saved by high-status people. Whereas kings and queens are already at the top of the social food chain. This would make their failure more tragic in the eyes of an audience.


II. Scope Neglect

Scope Neglect is a cognitive bias that leads people to disregard the extent of a problem. In an experiment, psychologists asked people how much they would give to save birds affected by oil spillage. Whether 2,000; 20,000 or 200,000 birds were in need of saving didn’t make much difference to how much people would donate.

Why? Psychologist Daniel Kahneman suggested that humans can’t cope with large numbers and tend to revert back to a single simple image:

The story […] probably evokes for many readers a mental representation of a prototypical incident, perhaps an image of an exhausted bird, its feathers soaked in black oil, unable to escape.

—Daniel Kahneman

As a species that evolved from tribal life, we don’t seem to cope well with huge numbers.


III. Heuristic Questions

Most of our everyday questions and problems are just too complex. Kahneman proposed that our mind generates intuitive opinions as a response. It does that by simply replacing a given difficult question with an easier heuristic question. According to Kahneman, this is an:

alternative to careful reasoning, which sometimes works fairly well and sometimes leads to serious errors.

—Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow

For example, the question How much would you contribute to save an endangered species? becomes How much emotion do I feel when I think of dying dolphins? A question about how happy we are with our lives these days turns into What is my mood right now?

These questions are much easier to answer. But they don’t always relate to what was being asked in the first place. We tell ourselves they do. Seriously though, who has the time to go through a lengthy process of reasoning every time we get asked something?

If you’re interested in heuristics, check out my posts on Mental Shortcuts: 5 Ways Heuristics Can Lead to Poor Decisions. 🐘

Share

Have a great week,

Chris
themindcollection.com

P.S.: Check out my latest post: How to Get Better at Writing in 7+1 Steps


Share this post
3 Ideas in 2 Minutes on Putting Things in Perspective
chrismeyer.substack.com
Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNew

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Chris Meyer
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing